PERF.AT Performance Technologies Score 6.6

Market cap 137.54M

P/E TTM 18.9×

Forward P/E 14.8×

ROIC 35.4%

FCF yield 1.8%

Performance Technologies S.A. (PERF.AT)

No price history is stored for PERF.AT, so there is no chart to draw. Every figure below is read from the filings and does not depend on one.

Multiples & size

2025-12-31 · EUR

Market cap 137.54Mp

P/E TTM 18.9×p

Forward P/E 14.8×e

EV/EBITDA 11.0×p

EV/EBIT 12.4×p

P/B 3.9×p

P/S TTM 1.5×p

EPS TTM 0.52

FCF yield 1.8%p

Dividend yield 1.1%p

Revenue growth +20.4%

Gross margin 33.0%

Operating margin 11.3%

Net margin 8.1%

FCF margin 2.8%

ROIC 35.4%

Payout 21.4%

Financials Annual

Figures

Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›

Performance Technologies S.A. reported revenue of 89.4M EUR for the year ending 31 December 2025, up 20.6% from 74.2M a year earlier. Every figure, period by period ›

0 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M

FY23 FY24 FY25

Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

4.3

Capex / sales 2.5%

SBC / sales 1.6%

ROCE 24.9%

Asset turnover 1.2×

ROIC 35.4%

Accruals 3.4%

Adj. EBITDA margin 14.3%

Profit margin 8.1%

ROE 20.8%

EBITDA margin 12.7%

Oper. margin 11.3%

Gross margin 33.0%

ROA 9.9%

OCF margin 5.3%

FCF margin 2.8%

OE margin 1.2%

DSO 157.3 days

OCF / EBIT 0.47×

18 of 19 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

6.2

EV/GP 4.2×

P/C 7.8×

EV/EBIT 12.4×

P/B 3.9×

PEG 0.95×

Fwd P/E 14.8×

P/E 18.9×

Div. yield 1.1%

FCF yield 1.8%

Shareholder yield 1.4%

EV/OE 117.4×

EV/Sales 1.4×

11 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

7.8

Gross margin stability across years 1 pp

Cash-flow margin stability 3.0 pp

2 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

8.3

Debt payback 0.0 yr

Interest cover 27.0×

Net debt / Eq 0.0×

ND/EBITDA 0.1

Cash / Debt 3.5×

Debt / Eq 0.14×

Retained / assets 37.9%

Payout 21.4%

Equity / Assets 47.8%

Quick ratio 2.0×

F-score 5.0 pts

Current ratio 2.0×

12 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

5.5

Div. growth +83.7%

Most recent margin move 3.1

EPS Y/Y +44.0%

Gross profit Y/Y +27.1%

Shares change +0.13%

EBIT Y/Y +38.1%

EPS next Y +15.6%

EBIT CAGR +25.1%

Operating margin trend 0.056

Sales/sh Y/Y +20.4%

10 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.