OXFORD INSTRUMENTS PLC (OXIG.L)

28.06GBP +1.67% (+0.46)

Over 3Y: +30.4%

2026-08-25

20 30

2023 2024 2025 2026

Multiples & size

2026-03-31

Market cap 1.62Bp

P/E TTM 33.5×p

EV/EBITDA 26.0×p

EV/EBIT 26.0×p

P/B 4.7×p

P/S TTM 3.8×p

EPS TTM 0.84

FCF yield 2.9%p

Dividend yield 0.8%p

Revenue growth -4.6%

Gross margin 55.8%

Operating margin 13.7%

Net margin 11.4%

FCF margin 11.1%

ROIC 19.6%

Payout 27.0%

52-week range

252 trading days

17.50 28.06 (69%) 32.81

Figures as at 2026-03-31, reported in GBP. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-04-01, 147 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

4.8

SBC / sales 0.0%

OE margin 11.1%

Oper. margin 13.7%

Adj. EBITDA margin 13.7%

ROIC 19.6%

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

6.2

EV/EBIT 26.0×

EV/OE 32.1×

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

8.2

ND/EBITDA 0.071

Interest cover 22.3×

Current ratio 1.8×

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.0

Sales/sh Y/Y -4.6%

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up OXIG.L on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	13.71
current ratio	1.83
current ratio reported	1.83
ev ebit	26.02
ev owner earnings	32.11
ev sales	3.57
fcf margin	11.11
interest cover	22.31
operating margin	13.71
owner earnings margin	11.11
revenue growth	-4.56
revenue growth per share	-4.56
roic	19.62
rule of 40	9.15
sbc pct revenue	0.0

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	7,400,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2026-03-31
cash	106,900,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2026-04-01
current assets	311,300,000	`CurrentAssets`	2026-04-01
current liabilities	170,200,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2026-04-01
equity	340,200,000	`Equity`	2026-04-01
interest expense	2,600,000	`FinanceCosts`	2026-03-31
ocf	54,400,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-03-31
revenue	423,200,000	`Revenue`	2026-03-31

What to be careful about

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions

See it scored yourself

The dashboard puts OXIG.L beside other companies and lets you change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which of the 61 measures are included at all.