Ooma, Inc. (OOMA)

23.20USD -0.77% (-0.18)

Over 1M: +5.6%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

20 21 22 23
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 21.8M Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 1.4M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 22.9M Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 563K Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 23.9M Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 4.2M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 24.4M Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 2.1M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 25.4M Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 5.3M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 25.9M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 6.5M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 25.2M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 6.1M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 24.8M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 2.5M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 26.1M Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 5M Q3 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 26.9M Q3 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 5.4M Q4 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 28.5M Q4 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 9.1M Q1 '27 — Cost of Revenue: 30.5M Q1 '27 — Free Cash Flow: 4.9M 0 7M 14M 21M 28M 35M
Q3 '24 Q1 '25 Q3 '25 Q1 '26 Q3 '26 Q1 '27
Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.0
OE margin 3.5%
ROIC 4.9%
Accruals -9.3%
OCF / EBIT 3.9×
Gross margin 61.3%
FCF margin 8.5%
OCF margin 10.5%
ROA 4.0%
ROCE 5.0%
ROE 9.6%

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

2.4
EV/OE 65.7×
EV/EBIT 84.6×
EV/GP 3.7×
EV/Sales 2.3×
FCF yield 3.9%
P/B 6.6×
P/C 36.7×
P/E 68.7×
Div. yield —
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

6.4
RPO / sales 0.059×
RPO growth -60.0%
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

4.1
ND/EBITDA -0.047
Payout 0.0%
Debt payback 1.3 yr
Net debt / Eq 0.32×
Cash / Debt 0.36×
Debt / Eq 0.5×
F-score 5.0 pts
Quick ratio 0.69×
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.7
Sales/sh Y/Y +6.0%
Sales Q/Q +24.8%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.