NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. (NWPX)

107.67USD -2.42% (-2.67)

Over 1M: -10.1%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

110 115 120
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '23 — Revenue: 118.7M Q3 '23 — Operating Cash Flow: 16.9M Q3 '23 — Net Income: 5.8M Q4 '23 — Revenue: 110.2M Q4 '23 — Operating Cash Flow: 9M Q4 '23 — Net Income: 5.4M Q1 '24 — Revenue: 113.2M Q1 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: -26.1M Q1 '24 — Net Income: 5.2M Q2 '24 — Revenue: 129.5M Q2 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 22.3M Q2 '24 — Net Income: 8.6M Q3 '24 — Revenue: 130.2M Q3 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 22.7M Q3 '24 — Net Income: 10.3M Q4 '24 — Revenue: 119.6M Q4 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 36.1M Q4 '24 — Net Income: 10.1M Q1 '25 — Revenue: 116.1M Q1 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 4.8M Q1 '25 — Net Income: 4M Q2 '25 — Revenue: 133.2M Q2 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 5.4M Q2 '25 — Net Income: 9.1M Q3 '25 — Revenue: 151.1M Q3 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 21M Q3 '25 — Net Income: 13.5M Q4 '25 — Revenue: 125.6M Q4 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 36M Q4 '25 — Net Income: 8.9M Q1 '26 — Revenue: 138.3M Q1 '26 — Operating Cash Flow: 29.3M Q1 '26 — Net Income: 10.5M Q2 '26 — Revenue: 159.5M Q2 '26 — Operating Cash Flow: 14.1M Q2 '26 — Net Income: 15.8M 0 40M 80M 120M 160M
Q4 '23 Q2 '24 Q4 '24 Q2 '25 Q4 '25 Q2 '26
Revenue Operating Cash Flow Net Income

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

4.4
OE margin 12.7%
Oper. margin 11.5%
ROIC 12.5%
Accruals -7.9%
FCF margin 13.9%
OCF / EBIT 1.5×
OCF margin 17.5%
ROA 7.5%
ROCE 12.3%
ROE 11.6%
Gross margin 20.9%
EBITDA margin —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

8.7
EV/OE 14.3×
EV/EBIT 15.8×
FCF yield 7.6%
EV/Sales 1.8×
P/B 2.5×
P/E 21.4×
EV/GP 8.7×
P/C 54.0×
Div. yield —
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

5.0
RPO / sales 0.53×
RPO growth 2.3%
Segment HHI 0.56 HHI

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

9.7
ND/EBITDA 0.0021
Debt / Eq 0.041×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
F-score 9.0 pts
Payout 0.0%
Cash / Debt 1.1×
Quick ratio 1.9×
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.7
Sales/sh Y/Y +16.6%
Sales CAGR 4Y +12.1%
EPS CAGR 4Y +32.4%
EBIT Y/Y +47.2%
EPS Y/Y +48.0%
Sales Q/Q +19.7%
EBIT CAGR +11.6%
Div. growth —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.