Nano Labs Ltd

NA — scored out of ten from its own filings

Figures as at 2025-12-31, reported in USD. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2025-12-31, 236 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

The five scores

Dimension	What it asks	Score
Quality	How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?	6.38
Valuation	What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?	0.5
Durability	How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?	1.0
Resilience	Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?	4.51
Growth	Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?	6.25

A dimension reading not measured means the filing does not carry the figures it needs. It is left out of the total rather than scored as though it were bad.

What each measure said

A dimension's score is the weighted average of these. Each links to the page explaining how it is worked out and which XBRL tags it reads.

Quality — 6.38

Measure	What it is	Score
Oper. margin	GAAP operating margin	10.0
SBC / sales	Stock compensation over revenue, inverted	10.0
Adj. EBITDA margin	Cash operating margin, before stock compensation	10.0
ROIC	Return on invested capital	1.22
OE margin	(Free cash flow − stock comp) over revenue	0.5

Durability — 1.0

Measure	What it is	Score
Revenue growth in the worst year on record	Revenue growth in the worst year on record	1.0
Gross margin stability across years, in percentage points	Gross margin stability across years, in percentage points	1.0
Cash-flow margin stability, operating cash flow over revenue	Cash-flow margin stability, operating cash flow over revenue	1.0

Resilience — 4.51

Measure	What it is	Score
Current ratio	Current ratio, excluding deferred revenue from the liabilities	5.91
ND/EBITDA	Net cash, or net debt over EBITDA	5.5
Interest cover, EBIT over interest	Interest cover, EBIT over interest	2.11

Growth — 6.25

Measure	What it is	Score
Operating margin trend, in percentage points per year	Operating margin trend, in percentage points per year	10.0
Most recent margin move, in percentage points	Most recent margin move, in percentage points	10.0
Sales/sh Y/Y	Revenue growth per diluted share, trailing twelve months against the prior twelve	1.0

A measure missing from a list here could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad.

Revenue by fiscal year

As the company reported it, one row per year, straight from the filings.

Fiscal year	Ends	Revenue
2022	2022-12-31	141,166,599
2023	2023-12-31	11,060,101
2024	2024-12-31	5,647,420
2025	2025-12-31	3,842,298

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up NA on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	305.22
current ratio	2.09
current ratio reported	2.09
dilution pct	146.9
ebit cagr	50.65
fcf margin	-401.07
interest cover	4.21
net debt ebitda	1.74
operating margin	264.35
owner earnings margin	-401.34
revenue growth	-31.96
revenue growth per share	-72.44
roic	6.33
rule of 40	232.39
sbc pct revenue	0.27

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	6,585	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2025-12-31
cash	4,939,300	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2025-12-31
current assets	61,299,941	`AssetsCurrent`	2025-12-31
current liabilities	29,308,921	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2025-12-31
equity	106,461,123	`StockholdersEquity`	2025-12-31
interest expense	2,409,833	`InterestExpenseNonoperating`	2025-12-31
ocf	-15,403,609	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	3,842,298	`Revenues`	2025-12-31
sbc	10,388	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2025-12-31

What to be careful about

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (236 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions

See it scored yourself

The dashboard puts NA beside other companies and lets you change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which of the 61 measures are included at all.