MASTEC INC (MTZ)

237.19USD +2.11% (+4.91)

Over 1M: -12.9%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

250 275 300
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 2.9B Q3 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 256.2M Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 2.9B Q4 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 455.1M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 2.4B Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 82.3M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 2.5B Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 232.9M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 2.8B Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 234.1M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 3B Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 423.4M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 2.5B Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 31.1M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 3.1B Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -58.2M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 3.4B Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 20.3M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 3.4B Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 292.5M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 3.4B Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 2.1M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 3.8B Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -70.1M 0 800M 1.6B 2.4B 3.2B 4B
Q4 '23 Q2 '24 Q4 '24 Q2 '25 Q4 '25 Q2 '26
Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.1
SBC / sales 0.23%
OE margin 1.3%
ROIC 4.9%
Accruals -0.8%
OCF / EBIT 1.6×
ROA 4.5%
ROE 14.2%
ROCE 5.0%
FCF margin 1.5%
OCF margin 3.6%
Gross margin 10.1%

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

2.4
EV/EBIT 58.3×
EV/OE 103.6×
EV/Sales 1.3×
FCF yield 1.3%
P/B 5.5×
P/C 60.3×
P/E 38.5×
Div. yield —
EV/GP —
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

7.0
RPO / sales 1.0×
RPO growth 43.0%
Segment HHI 0.27 HHI

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

3.2
ND/EBITDA -0.11
F-score 9.0 pts
Payout 0.0%
Quick ratio 1.4×
Cash / Debt 0.12×
Debt / Eq 0.79×
Debt payback 9.9 yr
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

3.8
Sales/sh Y/Y +23.8%
Sales CAGR 4Y +15.8%
EPS Y/Y +86.5%
Shares change -0.24%
Sales Q/Q +23.4%
EPS CAGR 4Y +3.3%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

2 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.