Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?
3.35
A dimension reading not measured means the filing does not carry the figures it
needs. It is left out of the total rather than scored as though it were bad.
What each measure said
A dimension's score is the weighted average of these. Each links to the page explaining
how it is worked out and which XBRL tags it reads.
A measure missing from a list here could not be computed from this
company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad.
Revenue by fiscal year
As the company reported it, one row per year, straight from the filings.
Fiscal year
Ends
Revenue
2018
2018-12-31
885,840,000
2019
2019-12-31
746,534,000
2020
2020-12-31
943,276,000
2021
2021-12-31
1,540,611,000
2022
2022-12-31
985,297,000
2023
2023-12-31
854,748,000
2024
2024-12-31
1,194,545,000
2025
2025-12-31
1,516,796,000
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
33.28
ebit cagr
8.74
ebit yoy
18.41
fcf margin
27.54
growth cv
2.23
operating margin
18.4
owner earnings margin
13.55
revenue growth
13.69
revenue growth per share
13.69
roic
697.2
rule of 40
32.09
sbc pct revenue
13.98
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
54,932,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
472,985,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
505,805,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
488,338,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
1,573,994,000
InvestmentBankingRevenue
2026-06-30
sbc
220,105,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
What to be careful about
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
See it scored yourself
The dashboard puts MC beside other companies and lets you
change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which
of the 61 measures are included at all.