Lightwave Logic, Inc. (LWLG)

5.35USD +4.49% (+0.23)

Over 1M: -34.0%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

5 6 7 8
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '21 — Free Cash Flow: -1.5M Q4 '21 — Free Cash Flow: -6.3M Q1 '22 — Free Cash Flow: -2.7M Q2 '22 — Free Cash Flow: -2.9M Q3 '22 — Free Cash Flow: -3.3M Q4 '22 — Free Cash Flow: -2.9M Q1 '23 — Free Cash Flow: -4M Q2 '23 — Free Cash Flow: -4M Q3 '23 — Free Cash Flow: -3.7M Q4 '23 — Free Cash Flow: -3.8M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 5.2K Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -5.5M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 0 Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -4.9M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 1.2K Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -3.9M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 984 Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -3.5M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 2K Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -4.3M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 3.5K Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -3.8M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 0 Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -3.2M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 1.3K Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -3.7M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 1.3K Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -4.5M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 0 Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -6.9M -6M -4.5M -3M -1.5M 0 1.5M
Q4 '21 Q3 '22 Q2 '23 Q1 '24 Q4 '24 Q3 '25 Q2 '26
Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

0.5
ROIC -230.4%
Accruals -6.0%
Gross margin 98.9%
Asset turnover 0.0023×
Capex / sales 781.7%
ROA -21.2%
ROCE -22.8%
ROE -21.9%
EBITDA margin —
FCF margin —
OCF / EBIT —
OCF margin —
OE margin —
Oper. margin —
Profit margin —
SBC / sales —

1 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

0.8
EV/Sales 2881.8×
EV/OE -29.5×
P/C 8.5×
FCF yield -2.2%
P/B 7.8×
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
EV/GP —
Fwd P/E —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.9
RPO / sales 0.4×
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

8.8
Current ratio 67.1×
ND/EBITDA 0.13
Cash runway 5.2 yr
Debt / Eq 0.0×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Quick ratio 62.8×
F-score 5.6 pts
Cash / Debt —
Interest cover —
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

6.2
Sales/sh Y/Y +148.7%
Sales CAGR 4Y +33.2%
Sales Q/Q +27.9%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

3 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.