Every figure this model derived for LWLG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,956,215
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
95,910,962
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
98,076,190
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,560,791
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
104,223,366
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-16,371,501
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
250,251
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
6,106,692
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
LWLG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
67.14
current ratio reported
62.84
deferred revenue growth
572.27
dilution pct
6.66
growth cv
1.4
revenue growth
165.22
revenue growth per share
148.66
roic
-230.42
rule of 40
-9522.98
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about LWLG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, sbc pct revenue, owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, ocf margin, ebitda margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -9,764% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 250,251 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged since 2024-12-31; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 96M of net cash against a 18M annual burn is 5.2 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin trend
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left