LNA SANTE (LNA.PA)

33.90EUR +0.59% (+0.20)

Over 6M: +34.9%

2026-08-25

25 30 35

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Multiples & size

2025-12-31

Market cap 365.19Mp

P/E TTM 14.2×p

EV/EBITDA 3.9×p

EV/EBIT 3.9×p

P/B 1.1×p

P/S TTM 0.4×p

EPS TTM 2.40

FCF yield 27.2%p

Revenue growth +13.1%

Operating margin 7.5%

Net margin 2.8%

FCF margin 10.9%

ROIC 23.1%

Payout 0.0%

52-week range

252 trading days

22.11 33.90 (85%) 35.90

Figures as at 2025-12-31, reported in EUR. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-01-01, 237 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

4.5

SBC / sales 0.0%

ROIC 23.1%

OE margin 10.9%

Oper. margin 7.5%

Adj. EBITDA margin 7.5%

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

10.0

EV/EBIT 3.9×

EV/OE 2.7×

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

7.0

ND/EBITDA 0.35

Interest cover —

Current ratio 0.91×

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

2.9

Sales/sh Y/Y +13.1%

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up LNA.PA on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	7.53
current ratio	0.91
current ratio reported	0.91
ev ebit	3.93
ev owner earnings	2.72
ev sales	0.3
fcf margin	10.89
operating margin	7.53
owner earnings margin	10.89
revenue growth	13.15
revenue growth per share	13.15
roic	23.07
rule of 40	20.68
sbc pct revenue	0.0

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
cash	94,827,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2026-01-01
current assets	421,382,000	`CurrentAssets`	2026-01-01
current liabilities	460,866,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2026-01-01
equity	330,252,000	`EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent`	2026-01-01
ocf	99,419,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	912,670,000	`Revenue`	2025-12-31

What to be careful about

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`

See it scored yourself

The dashboard puts LNA.PA beside other companies and lets you change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which of the 61 measures are included at all.