HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES, INC (HVT)

28.56USD +3.40% (+0.94)

Over 1M: -0.6%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

27 27.5 28 28.5
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '23 — Revenue: 220.3M Q3 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 86.3M Q3 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 33.3M Q4 '23 — Revenue: 210.7M Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 79.3M Q4 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 11.1M Q1 '24 — Revenue: 184M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 73M Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -3.3M Q2 '24 — Revenue: 178.6M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 70.7M Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 4.9M Q3 '24 — Revenue: 175.9M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 70M Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 16.1M Q4 '24 — Revenue: 184.4M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 70.2M Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 9.1M Q1 '25 — Revenue: 181.6M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 70.5M Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 27K Q2 '25 — Revenue: 181M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 70.9M Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 1.6M Q3 '25 — Revenue: 194.5M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 77.2M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 28.3M Q4 '25 — Revenue: 201.9M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 79.9M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 3M Q1 '26 — Revenue: 189.1M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 72.8M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -9.9M Q2 '26 — Revenue: 194.9M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 75.2M Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 18.1M 0 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
Q4 '23 Q2 '24 Q4 '24 Q2 '25 Q4 '25 Q2 '26
Revenue Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

8.3
ROIC 138.0%
Oper. margin 42.5%
OE margin 4.1%
Accruals -5.8%
ROCE 64.3%
Gross margin 60.9%
ROA 3.5%
ROE 7.8%
FCF margin 5.1%
OCF margin 7.8%
OCF / EBIT 0.18×

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

9.4
EV/EBIT 1.6×
EV/OE 16.8×
EV/GP 1.1×
EV/Sales 0.68×
Div. yield 3.3%
P/C 6.1×
FCF yield 6.2%
P/B 2.2×
P/E 27.9×
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.0
RPO / sales 0.056×
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

9.2
Interest cover 2046.1×
ND/EBITDA 0.2
Debt / Eq 0.0×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
F-score 6.4 pts
Quick ratio 0.97×
Payout 92.5%
Cash / Debt —
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

2.9
Sales/sh Y/Y +8.0%
Div. growth +1.8%
EBIT Y/Y +9.8%
EPS Y/Y +16.5%
Sales Q/Q +7.7%
EBIT CAGR -14.0%
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS next Y —
Shares change —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.