GRAINGER PLC (GRI.L)

1.73GBP -1.25% (-0.02)

Over 1Y: -7.0%

2026-08-27

1.6 1.8

Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul

Multiples & size

2025-09-30

Market cap 1.30Bp

P/E TTM 6.4×p

EV/EBITDA 21.3×p

EV/EBIT 21.3×p

P/B 0.63×p

P/S TTM 4.9×p

EPS TTM 0.27

FCF yield 9.5%p

Dividend yield 4.5%p

Revenue growth -9.4%

Operating margin 48.7%

Net margin 77.1%

FCF margin 46.6%

ROIC 2.9%

Payout 28.7%

Net debt/EBITDA 11.2×

52-week range

252 trading days

1.48 1.73 (55%) 1.93

Figures as at 2025-09-30, reported in GBP. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2025-10-01, 331 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

7.7

Adj. EBITDA margin 50.1%

OE margin 45.2%

SBC / sales 1.4%

Oper. margin 48.7%

ROIC 2.9%

FCF margin 46.6%

OCF margin 46.6%

Profit margin 77.1%

ROA 5.4%

Accruals 2.1%

ROE 9.9%

OCF / EBIT 0.96×

ROCE 3.6%

Asset turnover 0.07×

Capex / sales —

EBITDA margin —

Gross margin —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

7.2

EV/OE 22.9×

EV/EBIT 21.3×

Div. yield 4.5%

P/B 0.63×

P/E 6.4×

FCF yield 9.5%

Shareholder yield 4.5%

P/C 15.1×

EV/Sales 10.4×

EV/GP —

Fwd P/E —

PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

0.5

Cash-flow margin stability —

Gross margin stability across years —

Prepaid revenue growth —

RPO / sales —

RPO growth —

Revenue growth in the worst year on record —

Segment HHI —

0 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

4.2

Current ratio 2.7×

ND/EBITDA -0.52

Interest cover 2.8×

Equity / Assets 54.1%

Payout 28.7%

Quick ratio 1.2×

Debt / Eq 0.74×

Net debt / Eq 0.7×

Cash / Debt 0.057×

Debt payback 11.7 yr

Cash runway —

F-score —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.0

Sales/sh Y/Y -9.4%

EPS Y/Y +549.4%

Div. growth —

EBIT CAGR —

EBIT Y/Y —

EPS CAGR 4Y —

EPS next Y —

Gross profit Y/Y —

Most recent margin move —

Operating margin trend —

Sales CAGR 4Y —

Sales Q/Q —

Shares change —

1 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.