Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?
2.71
A dimension reading not measured means the filing does not carry the figures it
needs. It is left out of the total rather than scored as though it were bad.
What each measure said
A dimension's score is the weighted average of these. Each links to the page explaining
how it is worked out and which XBRL tags it reads.
A measure missing from a list here could not be computed from this
company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad.
Revenue by fiscal year
As the company reported it, one row per year, straight from the filings.
Fiscal year
Ends
Revenue
2021
2021-12-31
3,974,000,000
2022
2022-12-31
2,349,000,000
2023
2023-12-31
4,500,000,000
2024
2024-12-31
5,744,000,000
2025
2025-12-31
5,731,000,000
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
FG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
dilution pct
0.76
fcf margin
71.45
growth cv
2.47
owner earnings margin
70.89
revenue growth
15.01
revenue growth per share
14.14
sbc pct revenue
0.56
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
2,648,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
4,609,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
165,000,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-06-30
ocf
4,335,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
6,067,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
34,000,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
What to be careful about
no operating income found in XBRL
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
See it scored yourself
The dashboard puts FG beside other companies and lets you
change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which
of the 61 measures are included at all.