AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.

AQB — scored out of ten from its own filings

Figures as at 2025-12-31, reported in USD. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-06-30, 55 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

The five scores

Dimension	What it asks	Score
Quality	How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?	0.63
Valuation	What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?	0.5
Durability	How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?	1.0
Resilience	Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?	6.5
Growth	Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?	1.0

A dimension reading not measured means the filing does not carry the figures it needs. It is left out of the total rather than scored as though it were bad.

What each measure said

A dimension's score is the weighted average of these. Each links to the page explaining how it is worked out and which XBRL tags it reads.

Quality — 0.63

Measure	What it is	Score
SBC / sales	Stock compensation over revenue, inverted	1.0
Oper. margin	GAAP operating margin	0.5
OE margin	(Free cash flow − stock comp) over revenue	0.5
Adj. EBITDA margin	Cash operating margin, before stock compensation	0.5

Durability — 1.0

Measure	What it is	Score
Revenue growth in the worst year on record	Revenue growth in the worst year on record	1.0
Cash-flow margin stability, operating cash flow over revenue	Cash-flow margin stability, operating cash flow over revenue	1.0

Resilience — 6.5

Measure	What it is	Score
Current ratio	Current ratio, excluding deferred revenue from the liabilities	10.0
ND/EBITDA	Net cash, or net debt over EBITDA	9.0
Interest cover, EBIT over interest	Interest cover, EBIT over interest	0.5

Growth — 1.0

Measure	What it is	Score
Sales/sh Y/Y	Revenue growth per diluted share, trailing twelve months against the prior twelve	1.0
Sales CAGR 4Y	The same growth compounded over four fiscal years	1.0
Operating margin trend, in percentage points per year	Operating margin trend, in percentage points per year	1.0

A measure missing from a list here could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad.

Revenue by fiscal year

As the company reported it, one row per year, straight from the filings.

Fiscal year	Ends	Revenue
2018	2018-12-31	297,687
2019	2019-12-31	709,023
2020	2020-12-31	533,428
2021	2021-12-31	1,261,764
2022	2022-12-31	1,138,781
2023	2023-12-31	649,568
2024	2024-12-31	191,299
2025	2025-12-31	6,613

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up AQB on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	-32567.82
current ratio	4.26
current ratio reported	4.26
dilution pct	0.35
fcf margin	-152805.76
interest cover	-3.79
operating margin	-46523.44
owner earnings margin	-153089.28
revenue growth	-96.54
revenue growth per share	-96.56
rule of 40	-46619.98
sbc pct revenue	283.52

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	2,929,908	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2024-12-31
cash	31,244,179	`CashCashEquivalentsRestrictedCashAndRestrictedCashEquivalents`	2026-06-30
current assets	11,701,109	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	2,749,252	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	2,811,543	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	811,293	`InterestExpenseNonoperating`	2026-06-30
ocf	-7,175,137	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	6,613	`SellingAndMarketingExpense`	2025-12-31
sbc	18,749	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2026-06-30

What to be careful about

no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin recent

See it scored yourself

The dashboard puts AQB beside other companies and lets you change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which of the 61 measures are included at all.