WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC (WTW)

343.75 +1.23% (+4.17)

Over 6M: +13.8%

2026-08-28
Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles need the day’s open, high and low. Those are being collected now — a company shows them once its history has been refreshed.

250 300 350
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '23 — Operating Income: 159M Q3 '23 — Operating Cash Flow: 393M Q4 '23 — Operating Income: 779M Q4 '23 — Operating Cash Flow: 522M Q1 '24 — Operating Income: 280M Q1 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 24M Q2 '24 — Operating Income: 212M Q2 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 407M Q3 '24 — Operating Income: -766M Q3 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 482M Q4 '24 — Operating Income: 901M Q4 '24 — Operating Cash Flow: 599M Q1 '25 — Operating Income: 432M Q1 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: -35M Q2 '25 — Operating Income: 368M Q2 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 361M Q3 '25 — Operating Income: 418M Q3 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 678M Q4 '25 — Operating Income: 1B Q4 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 771M Q1 '26 — Operating Income: 448M Q1 '26 — Operating Cash Flow: -10M Q2 '26 — Operating Income: 364M Q2 '26 — Operating Cash Flow: 484M -400M 0 400M 800M 1.2B
Q4 '23 Q2 '24 Q4 '24 Q2 '25 Q4 '25 Q2 '26
Operating Income Operating Cash Flow

Figures as at 2026-06-30, reported in USD. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-06-30, 61 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

5.2
Oper. margin 22.2%
OE margin 14.8%
ROIC 10.8%
Accruals -1.2%
ROE 20.4%
FCF margin 16.7%
OCF margin 19.0%
ROA 5.1%
ROCE 14.7%
OCF / EBIT 0.86×
Gross margin —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

0.5
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
EV/GP —
EV/OE —
EV/Sales —
FCF yield —
Fwd P/E —
P/B —
P/C —
P/E —
PEG —

0 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.5
RPO / sales 0.15×
Segment HHI 0.5 HHI
RPO growth -9.1%

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

2.6
ND/EBITDA —
F-score 6.8 pts
Payout 22.8%
Quick ratio 1.1×
Cash / Debt 0.16×
Debt / Eq 1.4×
Debt payback 5.2 yr
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.8
Sales/sh Y/Y +6.1%
EBIT Y/Y +140.2%
EBIT CAGR +20.3%
Div. growth +1.1%
Sales Q/Q +9.1%
EPS CAGR 4Y -16.1%
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.