UL Solutions Inc. (ULS)

74.43 -1.48% (-1.12)

Over 1M: -18.8%

2026-08-28
Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles need the day’s open, high and low. Those are being collected now — a company shows them once its history has been refreshed.

80 90
31 Jul 5 Aug 10 Aug 13 Aug 18 Aug 21 Aug 26 Aug

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q1 '23 — Net Income: 55M Q2 '23 — Net Income: 94M Q3 '23 — Net Income: 53M Q4 '23 — Net Income: 58M Q1 '24 — Net Income: 56M Q2 '24 — Net Income: 101M Q3 '24 — Net Income: 88M Q4 '24 — Net Income: 81M Q1 '25 — Net Income: 67M Q2 '25 — Net Income: 91M Q3 '25 — Net Income: 100M Q4 '25 — Net Income: 67M Q1 '26 — Net Income: 92M Q2 '26 — Net Income: 246M 0 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
Q2 '23 Q4 '23 Q2 '24 Q4 '24 Q2 '25 Q4 '25 Q2 '26
Net Income

Figures as at 2026-06-30, reported in USD. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-06-30, 61 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

5.5
ROIC 26.9%
Oper. margin 17.9%
OE margin 11.9%
Accruals -5.5%
ROA 16.2%
ROCE 24.9%
ROE 31.7%
FCF margin 13.9%
Gross margin 50.3%
OCF margin 21.6%
OCF / EBIT 1.2×

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

0.5
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
EV/GP —
EV/OE —
EV/Sales —
FCF yield —
Fwd P/E —
P/B —
P/C —
P/E —
PEG —

0 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

6.5
RPO / sales 0.041×
Segment HHI 0.4 HHI
RPO growth -36.0%

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

8.0
ND/EBITDA —
Debt payback 0.13 yr
Net debt / Eq 0.036×
Cash / Debt 0.88×
Debt / Eq 0.31×
F-score 7.0 pts
Payout 21.8%
Quick ratio 1.4×
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.5
Sales/sh Y/Y +5.6%
EPS Y/Y +52.9%
Div. growth +4.0%
EBIT CAGR +9.3%
EBIT Y/Y +14.0%
Sales Q/Q +5.2%
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS next Y —
Sales CAGR 4Y —

3 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.