TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP. (TRLV)

12.11USD +1.00% (+0.12)

Over 6M: +32.1%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

8 10 12
May Jun Jul Aug Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '21 — Revenue: 224.1M Q3 '21 — Gross Profit: 153.9M Q4 '21 — Revenue: 298.9M Q4 '21 — Gross Profit: 132.9M Q1 '22 — Revenue: 317.7M Q1 '22 — Gross Profit: 180.5M Q2 '22 — Revenue: 313.8M Q2 '22 — Gross Profit: 183.4M Q3 '22 — Revenue: 295.4M Q3 '22 — Gross Profit: 168.7M Q4 '22 — Revenue: 298.5M Q4 '22 — Gross Profit: 157.1M Q1 '23 — Revenue: 285.2M Q1 '23 — Gross Profit: 150.2M Q2 '23 — Revenue: 281.8M Q2 '23 — Gross Profit: 141.6M Q3 '23 — Revenue: 275.2M Q3 '23 — Gross Profit: 142.9M Q4 '23 — Revenue: 287M Q4 '23 — Gross Profit: 153.9M Q1 '24 — Revenue: 297.6M Q1 '24 — Gross Profit: 173.8M Q2 '24 — Revenue: 303.4M Q2 '24 — Gross Profit: 181.6M Q3 '24 — Revenue: 284.3M Q3 '24 — Gross Profit: 173.3M Q4 '24 — Revenue: 301.1M Q4 '24 — Gross Profit: 187M Q1 '25 — Revenue: 297.8M Q1 '25 — Gross Profit: 183.2M Q2 '25 — Revenue: 302.1M Q2 '25 — Gross Profit: 182.9M Q3 '25 — Revenue: 288.2M Q3 '25 — Gross Profit: 169.9M Q4 '25 — Revenue: 293.1M Q4 '25 — Gross Profit: 175.2M Q1 '26 — Revenue: 286.8M Q1 '26 — Gross Profit: 170.1M Q2 '26 — Revenue: 271M Q2 '26 — Gross Profit: 162.3M 0 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M
Q4 '21 Q3 '22 Q2 '23 Q1 '24 Q4 '24 Q3 '25 Q2 '26
Revenue Gross Profit

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.0
OE margin 15.8%
Oper. margin -24.3%
ROIC -31.0%
Accruals -34.7%
FCF margin 17.6%
Gross margin 59.5%
OCF margin 21.5%
EBITDA margin -14.3%
Profit margin -41.8%
ROA -22.9%
ROCE -14.0%
ROE -62.2%
OCF / EBIT —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

9.9
EV/Sales 2.0×
EV/OE 12.6×
EV/GP 3.3×
FCF yield 8.7%
P/C 7.1×
P/B 3.0×
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
Fwd P/E —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

2.2
RPO / sales 0.0062×
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

6.8
ND/EBITDA 0.026
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Quick ratio 4.0×
Cash / Debt 1.2×
Debt / Eq 0.35×
F-score 6.0 pts
Cash runway —
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.3
Sales/sh Y/Y -4.6%
Div. growth +2062.0%
Sales Q/Q -10.3%
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.