Every figure this model derived for TM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2020-03-31
cash
15,918,163,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalents
2025-03-31
current assets
37,078,676,000,000
CurrentAssets
2025-03-31
current liabilities
29,434,220,000,000
CurrentLiabilities
2025-03-31
equity
35,924,826,000,000
EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent
2025-03-31
interest expense
1,609,083,000,000
InterestPaidClassifiedAsOperatingActivities
2025-03-31
ocf
3,696,934,000,000
CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-03-31
revenue
48,036,704,000,000
Revenue
2025-03-31
sbc
0
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2020-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
TM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
14.67
current ratio
1.26
current ratio reported
1.26
ebit cagr
70.62
ebit yoy
-10.41
fcf margin
7.7
growth cv
1.1
interest cover
2.98
net debt ebitda
4.1
operating margin
9.98
owner earnings margin
7.7
revenue growth
6.52
revenue growth per share
6.52
roic
5.85
rpo growth
6.62
rule of 40
16.51
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about TM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2025-03-31 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2025-03-31 (515 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2020-03-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2020-03-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
reports in JPY while its share price is quoted in USD, and no exchange rate could be used (no rate for USD to JPY that is less than 30 days old, and this is not a refresh). Every multiple would pair one currency with another, so none of them is a ratio — set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml in JPY to score it
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left