RAYONIER INC. (RYN)

20.46USD +0.69% (+0.14)

Over 1M: -6.1%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

20.5 21 21.5
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q2 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 194.2M Q3 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 233.3M Q4 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 217.2M Q1 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 161M Q2 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 194.3M Q3 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 152.1M Q4 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 180.9M Q1 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 149.2M Q2 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 168.4M Q3 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 145.6M Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 65.7M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 86.1M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 74.3M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 86.3M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 300.8M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 65M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 74.9M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 119.1M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 68.2M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 230.3M 0 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M
Q3 '21 Q2 '22 Q1 '23 Q4 '23 Q3 '24 Q2 '25 Q1 '26
Cost of Revenue

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

4.4
OE margin 35.3%
ROIC 0.44%
FCF margin 38.9%
OCF / EBIT 7.0×
OCF margin 38.9%
ROA 6.0%
Accruals 2.6%
ROE 8.7%
Gross margin 27.4%
ROCE 0.51%
Asset turnover 0.088×
Capex / sales —
EBITDA margin —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

3.4
EV/OE 31.5×
EV/EBIT 200.5×
Div. yield 4.3%
P/B 1.2×
P/E 13.2×
FCF yield 4.3%
P/C 9.0×
EV/Sales 11.1×
EV/GP —
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

1.3
RPO / sales 0.039×
Segment HHI 0.38 HHI
RPO growth —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

4.1
ND/EBITDA -0.18
Quick ratio 2.2×
Debt / Eq 0.39×
Net debt / Eq 0.26×
Cash / Debt 0.33×
Debt payback 5.3 yr
F-score 5.0 pts
Payout 56.5%
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.0
Sales CAGR 4Y -18.7%
Sales/sh Y/Y -32.1%
Div. growth +45.6%
EPS CAGR 4Y +29.4%
Sales Q/Q +233.8%
EPS Y/Y +25.8%
EBIT CAGR -36.7%
EBIT Y/Y -89.4%
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.