RANGER ENERGY SERVICES, INC. (RNGR)

16.78USD -0.83% (-0.14)

Over 1M: +4.2%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

16 17
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q2 '23 — Operating Income: 11.4M Q2 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 16M Q2 '23 — Net Income: 6.1M Q3 '23 — Operating Income: 11.7M Q3 '23 — Free Cash Flow: -2.8M Q3 '23 — Net Income: 9.4M Q4 '23 — Operating Income: 4.6M Q4 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 29.1M Q4 '23 — Net Income: 2.1M Q1 '24 — Operating Income: -500K Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 5.5M Q1 '24 — Net Income: -800K Q2 '24 — Operating Income: 7.3M Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 6.8M Q2 '24 — Net Income: 4.7M Q3 '24 — Operating Income: 12.9M Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 10.8M Q3 '24 — Net Income: 8.7M Q4 '24 — Operating Income: 8.9M Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 27.3M Q4 '24 — Net Income: 5.8M Q1 '25 — Operating Income: 1M Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 3.4M Q1 '25 — Net Income: 600K Q2 '25 — Operating Income: 8.6M Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 14.4M Q2 '25 — Net Income: 7.3M Q3 '25 — Operating Income: 2.6M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 8M Q3 '25 — Net Income: 1.2M Q4 '25 — Operating Income: 3.2M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 17.1M Q4 '25 — Net Income: 3.2M Q1 '26 — Operating Income: 5.1M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -21.7M Q1 '26 — Net Income: 3M -15M 0 15M 30M
Q3 '23 Q1 '24 Q3 '24 Q1 '25 Q3 '25 Q1 '26
Operating Income Free Cash Flow Net Income

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.3
OE margin 2.0%
ROIC 4.6%
Accruals -8.8%
OCF / EBIT 2.8×
ROA 3.2%
ROCE 5.4%
FCF margin 3.1%
OCF margin 9.6%
ROE 4.9%

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

6.2
EV/EBIT 22.2×
EV/OE 38.4×
EV/Sales 0.76×
P/B 1.3×
FCF yield 4.5%
Div. yield 1.1%
P/E 27.1×
P/C 57.7×
EV/GP —
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

2.2
Segment HHI 0.48 HHI
RPO / sales —
RPO growth —

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

6.2
ND/EBITDA -0.082
Debt / Eq 0.14×
Net debt / Eq 0.12×
Debt payback 2.0 yr
Payout 28.6%
Quick ratio 1.6×
Cash / Debt 0.16×
F-score 4.5 pts
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

2.5
Sales CAGR 4Y +16.9%
Sales/sh Y/Y +1.0%
Div. growth +22.2%
Shares change -0.78%
Sales Q/Q +17.7%
EBIT CAGR -0.31%
EPS Y/Y -25.2%
EBIT Y/Y -35.2%
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.