PHAROS ENERGY PLC (PHAR.L)

Every figure this model derived for PHAR.L, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	16,100,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2025-12-31
cash	40,200,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2026-01-01
current assets	66,200,000	`CurrentAssets`	2026-01-01
current liabilities	16,100,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2026-01-01
equity	283,900,000	`Equity`	2026-01-01
interest expense	2,200,000	`FinanceCosts`	2025-12-31
ocf	55,600,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	114,600,000	`Revenue`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up PHAR.L on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	7.59
current ratio	4.11
current ratio reported	4.11
ebit cagr	-34.85
ebit yoy	-86.47
fcf margin	34.47
interest cover	3.95
operating margin	7.59
owner earnings margin	34.47
revenue growth	-15.74
revenue growth per share	-15.74
roic	2.82
rule of 40	-8.14
sbc pct revenue	0.0

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about PHAR.L's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
reports in USD and quotes in GBP, so the share price is converted at 1 GBP = 1.3590 USD as at 2026-08-28. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate — but no share count is available, so there is still no market capitalisation
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage