Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT)

1.00USD +2.55% (+0.02)

Over 1M: +0.0%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

1 1.05 1.1
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Annual

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
FY25 — Cost of Revenue: 2.5M FY25 — Operating Cash Flow: -3.6M -3M -1.5M 0 1.5M 3M
FY25
Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

2.4
OE margin -87.0%
Oper. margin -131.4%
ROIC -102.2%
Accruals 0.81%
Gross margin 44.2%
EBITDA margin -123.9%
FCF margin -87.0%
OCF margin -80.4%
Profit margin -78.7%
ROA -37.7%
ROCE -76.1%
ROE -52.5%
OCF / EBIT —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

5.7
EV/Sales 0.75×
EV/OE -0.86×
EV/GP 1.7×
P/B 0.82×
P/C 2.3×
FCF yield -70.5%
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
Fwd P/E —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.4
RPO / sales 0.15×
Segment HHI 0.55 HHI
RPO growth —

1 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

6.8
ND/EBITDA 0.64
Interest cover -315.7×
Cash / Debt 12.1×
Debt / Eq 0.029×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Quick ratio 2.4×
Cash runway 0.55 yr
F-score 4.0 pts
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

8.2
Sales/sh Y/Y +36.8%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —
Sales CAGR 4Y —
Sales Q/Q —

3 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.