MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP)

2.39USD +1.70% (+0.04)

Over 1M: -2.4%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '25 — Revenue: 168.7M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 75.7M Q4 '25 — Revenue: 174.2M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 74.8M Q1 '26 — Revenue: 187.7M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 89.5M Q2 '26 — Revenue: 213.6M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 107.6M 0 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
Q3 '25 Q4 '25 Q1 '26 Q2 '26
Revenue Cost of Revenue

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

5.5
SBC / sales 0.026%
ROIC —
OE margin -1.5%
Accruals -6.4%
Gross margin 53.3%
ROCE 11.4%
FCF margin -1.5%
OCF / EBIT 0.42×
OCF margin 2.6%
ROA -2.8%
ROE —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

5.4
EV/EBIT 11.7×
EV/OE -49.3×
EV/Sales 0.74×
FCF yield -11.7%
P/C 1870.2×
Div. yield —
EV/GP —
Fwd P/E —
P/B —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

2.9
RPO / sales 0.51×
Segment HHI 0.29 HHI
RPO growth -10.8%

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

1.8
ND/EBITDA -0.83
Quick ratio 0.76×
Cash / Debt 0.00011×
F-score 3.4 pts
Cash runway —
Debt / Eq —
Debt payback —
Equity / Assets —
Net debt / Eq —
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

2.5
Sales/sh Y/Y +4.0%
Sales Q/Q +18.2%
EBIT CAGR -2.5%
EBIT Y/Y -3.8%
Div. growth —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —
Shares change —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.