MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW)

21.13USD +0.14% (+0.03)

Over 1M: -9.9%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

21 22 23
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 329.4M Q4 '23 — Free Cash Flow: -10.9M Q4 '23 — Net Income: 17.7M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 317.6M Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -41.3M Q1 '24 — Net Income: -2.3M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 323M Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 47.1M Q2 '24 — Net Income: 9M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 296M Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 4.3M Q3 '24 — Net Income: 1.8M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 329.4M Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 23.9M Q4 '24 — Net Income: -68.2M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 276.1M Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -34.5M Q1 '25 — Net Income: -3.5M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 283.5M Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -2.4M Q2 '25 — Net Income: -8.9M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 227.4M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -23.3M Q3 '25 — Net Income: 15.4M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 203M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 903K Q4 '25 — Net Income: -27.5M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 185.1M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -57.2M Q1 '26 — Net Income: 43.6M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 156.6M Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -19.5M Q2 '26 — Net Income: -21.8M Q3 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 157.8M Q3 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -6.1M Q3 '26 — Net Income: -23.7M 0 80M 160M 240M 320M 400M
Q1 '24 Q3 '24 Q1 '25 Q3 '25 Q1 '26 Q3 '26
Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow Net Income

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.3
ROIC 5.9%
OE margin -9.0%
Accruals 2.0%
Gross margin 36.6%
ROCE 6.1%
ROA -2.0%
FCF margin -7.4%
OCF / EBIT -0.78×
OCF margin -5.3%
ROE -6.0%

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

4.8
EV/EBIT 15.7×
EV/OE -11.9×
Div. yield 5.1%
EV/GP 2.9×
EV/Sales 1.1×
P/B 1.4×
P/C 16.9×
FCF yield -12.4%
Fwd P/E —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.9
Segment HHI 0.35 HHI
RPO / sales —
RPO growth —

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

2.6
ND/EBITDA -0.44
Quick ratio 1.0×
Debt / Eq 1.2×
F-score 5.0 pts
Cash / Debt 0.069×
Cash runway —
Debt payback —
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.5
Sales/sh Y/Y -32.2%
Div. growth +4.3%
Sales Q/Q -29.6%
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.