LSI INDUSTRIES INC (LYTS)

20.23USD +0.60% (+0.12)

Over 1M: -19.6%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

20 22 24
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q4 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 74.1M Q1 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 81.9M Q2 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 85.7M Q3 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 83.3M Q4 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 95M Q1 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 92.3M Q2 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 94.6M Q3 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 85.3M Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 87.8M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 86.9M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 77.5M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 77M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 94.7M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 104.4M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 112.9M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 99.6M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 114.4M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 117M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 109.6M Q3 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 112.3M 0 25M 50M 75M 100M 125M
Q1 '22 Q4 '22 Q3 '23 Q2 '24 Q1 '25 Q4 '25 Q3 '26
Cost of Revenue

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.5
SBC / sales 0.62%
OE margin 5.6%
ROIC 4.3%
Accruals -2.3%
FCF margin 6.2%
OCF / EBIT 1.2×
ROA 3.0%
ROCE 5.9%
ROE 6.8%
Gross margin 25.6%
OCF margin 6.9%

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

6.0
EV/OE 30.9×
EV/EBIT 29.3×
EV/Sales 1.7×
FCF yield 5.1%
P/B 2.1×
Div. yield 0.83%
EV/GP 6.7×
P/E 31.1×
P/C 71.8×
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.8
RPO / sales 0.012×
Segment HHI 0.98 HHI
RPO growth —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

4.2
ND/EBITDA -0.29
Payout 25.7%
Debt / Eq 0.9×
Debt payback 8.2 yr
F-score 5.0 pts
Net debt / Eq 0.87×
Quick ratio 0.86×
Cash / Debt 0.032×
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

3.6
Sales CAGR 4Y +16.1%
Sales/sh Y/Y +8.7%
EPS CAGR 4Y +39.3%
EBIT CAGR +15.0%
Sales Q/Q +13.6%
Div. growth +4.1%
EBIT Y/Y +9.2%
EPS Y/Y +6.4%
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.