Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD)

386.81USD +2.07% (+7.83)

Over 1M: +3.0%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

360 370 380
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 8.2B Q3 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: -98.4M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: -207.3M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 7.8B Q4 '25 — Operating Cash Flow: 123.7M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 30.5M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 7.8B Q1 '26 — Operating Cash Flow: -108.4M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -205.5M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 8.3B Q2 '26 — Operating Cash Flow: -65.7M Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: -122M 0 2B 4B 6B 8B 10B
Q3 '25 Q4 '25 Q1 '26 Q2 '26
Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

3.1
SBC / sales 0.14%
Adj. EBITDA margin 5.1%
Oper. margin 4.1%
ROIC 7.6%
OE margin -1.5%
Asset turnover 1.4×
Capex / sales 0.94%
Accruals 3.3%
ROA 2.7%
ROCE 8.6%
ROE 11.2%
EBITDA margin 5.0%
Profit margin 1.9%
FCF margin -1.3%
Gross margin 15.2%
OCF / EBIT -0.096×
OCF margin -0.39%

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

5.4
EV/EBIT 11.8×
EV/OE -32.7×
EV/Sales 0.48×
Shareholder yield 15.1%
EV/GP 3.2×
P/B 1.3×
P/E 11.9×
Div. yield 0.62%
FCF yield -5.9%
P/C 77.1×
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

5.7
Revenue growth in the worst year on record 4.0%
Gross margin stability across years 1.3 pp
Cash-flow margin stability 3.4 pp
RPO / sales 0.017×
RPO growth 55.5%
Prepaid revenue growth —
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

2.1
Interest cover 5.6×
ND/EBITDA -0.53
Current ratio 1.0×
Payout 7.4%
Equity / Assets 24.4%
Net debt / Eq 1.5×
Cash / Debt 0.011×
Debt / Eq 1.5×
F-score 3.0 pts
Quick ratio 0.21×
Cash runway —
Debt payback —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

2.7
Most recent margin move -0.31
Sales CAGR 4Y +13.3%
Operating margin trend -0.8
Sales/sh Y/Y +8.9%
Shares change -6.3%
Gross profit Y/Y +3.1%
Div. growth -2.1%
EBIT CAGR -6.3%
EBIT Y/Y -7.1%
EPS CAGR 4Y -3.0%
EPS Y/Y -13.9%
Sales Q/Q +2.2%
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.