INTELLIGENT LIVING APPLICATION GROUP INC. (ILAG)

3.28 +0.31% (+0.01)

Over 6M: +20.6%

2026-08-28
Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles need the day’s open, high and low. Those are being collected now — a company shows them once its history has been refreshed.

2 3 4
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Financials Annual

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
FY23 — Revenue: 6.4M FY23 — Operating Cash Flow: -3.2M FY23 — Free Cash Flow: -4.5M FY23 — Net Income: -3.5M FY24 — Revenue: 7.5M FY24 — Operating Cash Flow: -3M FY24 — Free Cash Flow: -3.2M FY24 — Net Income: -3.7M FY25 — Revenue: 4.5M FY25 — Operating Cash Flow: -2.4M FY25 — Free Cash Flow: -2.5M FY25 — Net Income: -19.3M -18M -12M -6M 0 6M 12M
FY23 FY24 FY25
Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

Figures as at 2025-12-31, reported in USD. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2025-12-31, 242 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

0.6
SBC / sales 31.3%
OE margin -85.9%
Oper. margin -430.7%
ROIC -264.2%
Accruals -199.4%
EBITDA margin -413.1%
FCF margin -54.6%
OCF margin -54.1%
Profit margin -430.6%
ROA -228.1%
ROCE -385.1%
ROE -398.4%
OCF / EBIT —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

0.5
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
EV/GP —
EV/OE —
EV/Sales —
FCF yield —
Fwd P/E —
P/B —
P/C —
P/E —
PEG —

0 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

1.1
RPO / sales 0.0073×
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

2.6
ND/EBITDA —
Interest cover -412.5×
Debt / Eq 0.32×
Net debt / Eq 0.19×
Cash / Debt 0.41×
F-score 2.0 pts
Quick ratio 0.41×
Cash runway —
Debt payback —
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.0
Sales CAGR 4Y -22.6%
Sales/sh Y/Y -46.9%
Shares change +12.8%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —
Sales Q/Q —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.