AQUILA PART PROD COM S.A. (FH9.F)

No price history is stored for FH9.F, so there is no chart to draw. Every figure below is read from the filings and does not depend on one.

Figures as at the most recent filing, reported in RON. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2023-01-01, 1334 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

2.9
ROIC 16.5%
ROA 10.0%
ROCE 16.8%
ROE 17.6%
Accruals 1.9%
OCF / EBIT 0.71×
Asset turnover —
Capex / sales —
EBITDA margin —
FCF margin —
Gross margin —
OCF margin —
OE margin —
Oper. margin —
Profit margin —
SBC / sales —

1 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

0.5
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
EV/GP —
EV/OE —
EV/Sales —
FCF yield —
Fwd P/E —
P/B —
P/C —
P/E —
PEG —

0 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

0.5
RPO / sales —
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

0 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

8.5
ND/EBITDA —
Debt / Eq 0.0×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Quick ratio 1.7×
Payout 99.2%
Cash / Debt —
Cash runway —
F-score —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

0.5
EPS Y/Y +20.4%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS next Y —
Sales CAGR 4Y —
Sales Q/Q —
Sales/sh Y/Y —
Shares change —

0 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up FH9.F on one particular measure came for.

RatioValue
current ratio2.22
current ratio reported2.22
interest cover25.24
roic16.47

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

FigureValueXBRL tagAs at
capex 14,958,070 PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities 2022-12-31
cash 18,863,042 CashAndCashEquivalents 2023-01-01
current assets 619,003,214 CurrentAssets 2023-01-01
current liabilities 278,585,417 CurrentLiabilities 2023-01-01
equity 483,391,226 EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent 2023-01-01
interest expense 3,836,199 FinanceCosts 2022-12-31
ocf 68,937,759 CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities 2022-12-31

What to be careful about

See it scored yourself

The dashboard puts FH9.F beside other companies and lets you change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which of the 61 measures are included at all.