Elastic N.V. (ESTC)

91.81USD -4.49% (-4.32)

Over 1M: +22.2%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

80 90 100
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 77.5M Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 37.2M Q1 '24 — Net Income: -48.5M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 80.1M Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: -3.3M Q2 '24 — Net Income: -24.8M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 84.6M Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 51.3M Q3 '24 — Net Income: 176.1M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 87.9M Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 60.1M Q4 '24 — Net Income: -41.1M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 91.8M Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 52M Q1 '25 — Net Income: -49.2M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 93.2M Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 37.7M Q2 '25 — Net Income: -25.4M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 97.2M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 87.3M Q3 '25 — Net Income: -17.1M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 97.8M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 84.9M Q4 '25 — Net Income: -16.4M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 96.7M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 104.2M Q1 '26 — Net Income: -24.6M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 102M Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 26M Q2 '26 — Net Income: -51.3M Q3 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 106.4M Q3 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 41.8M Q3 '26 — Net Income: 7.8M Q4 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 111.1M Q4 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 149.8M Q4 '26 — Net Income: 435.9M 0 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M
Q2 '24 Q4 '24 Q2 '25 Q4 '25 Q2 '26 Q4 '26
Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow Net Income

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

1.6
SBC / sales 17.2%
OE margin 1.3%
Oper. margin -1.9%
ROIC -5.5%
Gross margin 76.1%
ROA 11.7%
ROE 28.8%
Accruals 1.3%
FCF margin 18.5%
OCF margin 18.8%
ROCE -1.7%
OCF / EBIT —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

4.8
EV/Sales 5.0×
EV/OE 374.2×
P/C 7.0×
EV/GP 6.6×
FCF yield 3.4%
P/E 26.0×
P/B 7.5×
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

7.4
RPO / sales 1.1×
RPO growth 28.3%
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

6.8
ND/EBITDA 0.091
Cash / Debt 2.4×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Payout 0.0%
Quick ratio 1.7×
Debt / Eq 0.45×
F-score 5.0 pts
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

5.4
Sales CAGR 4Y +19.2%
Sales/sh Y/Y +13.4%
Sales Q/Q +16.0%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.