ENERPAC TOOL GROUP CORP. (EPAC)

37.34USD +1.08% (+0.40)

Over 1M: -1.0%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

36.5 37 37.5
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q4 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 79.2M Q1 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 71.3M Q2 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 76.6M Q3 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 79.8M Q4 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 78.1M Q1 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 71.5M Q2 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 71.6M Q3 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 78.4M Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 81.7M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 67.7M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 67M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 72.5M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 81.3M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 70.5M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 72.1M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 78.8M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 83.7M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 71M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 83M Q3 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 78.8M 0 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M
Q1 '22 Q4 '22 Q3 '23 Q2 '24 Q1 '25 Q4 '25 Q3 '26
Cost of Revenue

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

5.6
OE margin 15.7%
Oper. margin 21.2%
ROIC 21.1%
Accruals -3.8%
ROA 11.5%
ROCE 19.9%
ROE 22.0%
FCF margin 17.7%
Gross margin 50.1%
OCF margin 19.6%
OCF / EBIT 0.92×

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

8.3
EV/EBIT 14.8×
EV/OE 20.0×
EV/GP 6.3×
FCF yield 5.9%
P/E 20.5×
EV/Sales 3.1×
P/B 4.5×
P/C 16.5×
Div. yield 0.11%
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

4.2
RPO / sales 0.0069×
RPO growth 100.0%
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

7.7
ND/EBITDA -0.04
Debt payback 0.71 yr
Net debt / Eq 0.19×
Payout 2.3%
Cash / Debt 0.59×
Quick ratio 2.0×
Debt / Eq 0.46×
F-score 6.0 pts
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.7
Sales/sh Y/Y +5.0%
EBIT CAGR +48.4%
EPS CAGR 4Y +28.2%
Shares change -0.69%
EBIT Y/Y +8.9%
EPS Y/Y +5.5%
Div. growth -0.51%
Sales Q/Q +5.6%
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.