Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO)

0.58USD +5.94% (+0.03)

Over 1M: -8.6%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

0.6 0.8
7 Aug 12 Aug 17 Aug 20 Aug 25 Aug 28 Aug 2 Sep

Financials Annual

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
FY21 — Revenue: 147.9M FY21 — Operating Income: -150.2M FY21 — Operating Cash Flow: -9.5M FY21 — Free Cash Flow: -11.5M FY22 — Revenue: 35.7M FY22 — Operating Income: -36.2M FY22 — Operating Cash Flow: -18.4M FY22 — Free Cash Flow: -18.4M FY23 — Revenue: 40.1M FY23 — Operating Income: -37.3M FY23 — Operating Cash Flow: -26.2M FY23 — Free Cash Flow: -26.3M FY24 — Revenue: 46.5M FY24 — Operating Income: -17.2M FY24 — Operating Cash Flow: -8.3M FY24 — Free Cash Flow: -11.4M FY25 — Revenue: 50.7M FY25 — Operating Income: -19.1M FY25 — Operating Cash Flow: -8.6M FY25 — Free Cash Flow: -12M -120M -60M 0 60M 120M 180M
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
Revenue Operating Income Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

2.4
SBC / sales 0.0039%
OE margin -23.6%
Oper. margin -37.6%
ROIC -23.7%
Accruals -3.1%
EBITDA margin -34.6%
FCF margin -23.6%
Gross margin 17.9%
OCF margin -17.0%
Profit margin -23.9%
ROA -10.7%
ROCE -23.0%
ROE -14.6%
OCF / EBIT —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

4.8
EV/OE 1.3×
EV/Sales -0.31×
EV/GP -1.7×
P/B 0.046×
P/C 0.18×
FCF yield -317.4%
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
Fwd P/E —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

2.1
RPO / sales 0.051×
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

4 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

5.1
ND/EBITDA -1.2
Interest cover -146.6×
Cash / Debt 15.2×
Debt / Eq 0.016×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Quick ratio 1.8×
Cash runway 1.6 yr
F-score 2.2 pts
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

3.1
Sales CAGR 4Y -23.5%
Sales/sh Y/Y -88.6%
EPS Y/Y -129.8%
Shares change +861.0%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS next Y —
Sales Q/Q —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.