GINKGO BIOWORKS HOLDINGS, INC. (DNA)

6.96USD -4.13% (-0.30)

Over 5Y: -98.3%

2026-08-28
Style
Area Line Line with markersneeds a shorter window Steps Candlesneeds a shorter window Hollow candlesneeds a shorter window Barsneeds a shorter window

Candles need the day’s open, high and low. Those are being collected now — a company shows them once its history has been refreshed.

200 400 600
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Figures as at 2026-06-30, reported in USD. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-06-30, 62 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

0.6
SBC / sales 61.5%
OE margin -217.8%
Oper. margin -259.9%
ROIC -285.8%
Accruals -12.2%
Gross margin 95.7%
EBITDA margin -211.6%
FCF margin -156.3%
OCF margin -152.2%
Profit margin -260.0%
ROA -29.4%
ROCE -31.7%
ROE -69.2%
OCF / EBIT —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

5.7
EV/Sales 0.93×
EV/OE -0.42×
P/B 1.1×
P/C 1.3×
FCF yield -39.4%
Div. yield —
EV/EBIT —
EV/GP —
Fwd P/E —
P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

3.4
RPO / sales 1.0×
RPO growth 10.7%
Segment HHI —

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

7.4
ND/EBITDA 3.3
Cash runway 1.9 yr
Cash / Debt 16997.7×
Debt / Eq 4.8e-05×
Debt payback 0.0 yr
Quick ratio 4.6×
F-score 2.6 pts
Interest cover —
Payout —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

4.7
Sales CAGR 4Y -14.2%
Sales/sh Y/Y -50.2%
Sales Q/Q -48.5%
Div. growth —
EBIT CAGR —
EBIT Y/Y —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS Y/Y —
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.