DIASORIN S.P.A. (DIA.MI)

No price history is stored for DIA.MI, so there is no chart to draw. Every figure below is read from the filings and does not depend on one.

Multiples & size

2025-12-31

Market cap 4.20Bp

P/E TTM 28.0×p

EV/EBITDA 17.7×p

EV/EBIT 17.7×p

P/B 2.7×p

P/S TTM 3.5×p

EPS TTM 2.75

FCF yield 6.7%p

Dividend yield 1.5%p

Revenue growth +0.81%

Gross margin 64.7%

Operating margin 19.1%

Net margin 12.6%

FCF margin 23.5%

ROIC 12.7%

Payout 42.3%

Figures as at 2025-12-31, reported in EUR. The newest fact in the filings is dated 2026-01-01, 238 days ago. Nothing on this page is advice.

How it scores

Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

5.4

SBC / sales 0.93%

OE margin 22.6%

Adj. EBITDA margin 20.1%

Oper. margin 19.1%

ROIC 12.7%

Accruals -6.7%

FCF margin 23.5%

Gross margin 64.7%

OCF / EBIT 1.5×

OCF margin 28.7%

Profit margin 12.6%

ROA 5.2%

ROCE 9.7%

ROE 9.5%

Asset turnover 0.42×

Capex / sales 5.2%

EBITDA margin —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

8.4

EV/OE 15.0×

EV/EBIT 17.7×

EV/GP 5.2×

FCF yield 6.7%

P/B 2.7×

Div. yield 1.5%

EV/Sales 3.4×

P/C 25.4×

P/E 28.0×

Shareholder yield 1.5%

Fwd P/E —

PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

0.5

Cash-flow margin stability —

Gross margin stability across years —

Prepaid revenue growth —

RPO / sales —

RPO growth —

Revenue growth in the worst year on record —

Segment HHI —

0 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

6.0

ND/EBITDA 0.041

Interest cover 9.0×

Current ratio 1.6×

Debt / Eq 0.0×

Debt payback 0.0 yr

Net debt / Eq 0.0×

Equity / Assets 55.1%

Payout 42.3%

Quick ratio 0.89×

Cash / Debt —

Cash runway —

F-score —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.1

Sales/sh Y/Y +0.81%

EPS Y/Y -19.8%

Div. growth —

EBIT CAGR —

EBIT Y/Y —

EPS CAGR 4Y —

EPS next Y —

Gross profit Y/Y —

Most recent margin move —

Operating margin trend —

Sales CAGR 4Y —

Sales Q/Q —

Shares change —

1 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up DIA.MI on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	20.06
current ratio	1.55
current ratio reported	1.55
ev ebit	17.67
ev owner earnings	14.96
ev sales	3.38
fcf margin	23.52
interest cover	8.99
operating margin	19.13
owner earnings margin	22.59
revenue growth	0.81
revenue growth per share	0.81
roic	12.73
rule of 40	19.94
sbc pct revenue	0.93

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	61,728,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2025-12-31
cash	165,799,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2026-01-01
current assets	785,093,000	`CurrentAssets`	2026-01-01
current liabilities	505,792,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2026-01-01
equity	1,584,493,000	`EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent`	2026-01-01
interest expense	25,438,000	`FinanceCosts`	2025-12-31
ocf	342,760,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	1,195,055,000	`Revenue`	2025-12-31
sbc	11,111,000	`AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments`	2025-12-31

What to be careful about

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
share count is from 2025-12-31 (239 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions

See it scored yourself

The dashboard puts DIA.MI beside other companies and lets you change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which of the 61 measures are included at all.