CABOT CORP (CBT)

81.48USD +0.36% (+0.29)

Over 6M: +18.1%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

70 80 90
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 740M Q4 '23 — Free Cash Flow: 60M Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 740M Q1 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 51M Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 773M Q2 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 133M Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 760M Q3 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 155M Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 761M Q4 '24 — Free Cash Flow: 112M Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 720M Q1 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 47M Q2 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 695M Q2 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 1M Q3 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 679M Q3 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 188M Q4 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 679M Q4 '25 — Free Cash Flow: 155M Q1 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 638M Q1 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 57M Q2 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 694M Q2 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 32M Q3 '26 — Cost of Revenue: 798M Q3 '26 — Free Cash Flow: 37M 0 200M 400M 600M 800M
Q1 '24 Q3 '24 Q1 '25 Q3 '25 Q1 '26 Q3 '26
Cost of Revenue Free Cash Flow

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

4.6
Oper. margin 13.6%
OE margin 7.2%
ROIC 15.9%
Accruals -7.7%
ROCE 17.4%
ROA 4.8%
ROE 11.8%
FCF margin 7.7%
OCF margin 13.7%
Gross margin 22.7%
OCF / EBIT 1.0×

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

9.1
EV/EBIT 10.2×
EV/OE 19.2×
EV/Sales 1.4×
FCF yield 6.7%
Div. yield 2.3%
EV/GP 6.1×
P/B 2.6×
P/E 22.1×
P/C 16.8×
Fwd P/E —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

5.1
Segment HHI 0.52 HHI
RPO / sales —
RPO growth —

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

4.5
ND/EBITDA -0.17
Cash / Debt 0.23×
Debt / Eq 0.68×
Debt payback 3.0 yr
F-score 6.0 pts
Net debt / Eq 0.52×
Payout 51.1%
Quick ratio 0.97×
Cash runway —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

2.4
Sales/sh Y/Y -2.1%
EPS CAGR 4Y +8.5%
Div. growth +3.2%
EBIT CAGR +6.5%
Sales Q/Q +6.4%
EBIT Y/Y -22.2%
EPS Y/Y -54.1%
EPS next Y —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.