BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC. (BLPG)

0.06USD +0.00% (+0.00)

Over 1M: +1.1%

Style
Area Line Line with markers Steps Candles Hollow candles Bars

Candles and bars need the day’s open, high and low, and need room to be drawn in: past about a year of trading a body is thinner than a hairline, so those three offer the longest window that fits instead.

0.05 0.06 0.06
6 Aug 11 Aug 14 Aug 19 Aug 24 Aug 27 Aug 1 Sep

Financials Quarterly

Figures
Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Cost of Revenue Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Net Income

A share count and earnings a share are not here: neither is money, so neither can share this axis. Both have their own panel on All charts.

All charts ›
Q2 '20 — Cost of Revenue: 352.7K Q3 '20 — Cost of Revenue: 286.1K Q4 '20 — Cost of Revenue: 293.3K Q1 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 304.7K Q2 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 337.1K Q3 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 316.9K Q4 '21 — Cost of Revenue: 326.2K Q1 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 283.1K Q2 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 310.6K Q3 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 345.5K Q4 '22 — Cost of Revenue: 339.1K Q1 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 360.9K Q2 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 367.7K Q3 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 388.9K Q4 '23 — Cost of Revenue: 425K Q1 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 377.2K Q2 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 418.7K Q3 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 406K Q4 '24 — Cost of Revenue: 389K Q1 '25 — Cost of Revenue: 388.5K 0 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K
Q3 '20 Q2 '21 Q1 '22 Q4 '22 Q3 '23 Q2 '24 Q1 '25
Cost of Revenue

How it scores

For a valuation multiple, the low end is the good end.

Quality

How much of the revenue is really kept — and what did it take to earn it?

5.3
ROIC —
OE margin 2.2%
Accruals -13.5%
ROCE 179.1%
Gross margin 62.4%
OCF / EBIT 1.5×
ROA 6.6%
FCF margin 6.3%
OCF margin 6.3%
ROE —

5 of 17 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Valuation

What does the price ask for what the company earns, owns and pays out?

10.0
EV/EBIT 3.8×
EV/OE 7.4×
EV/GP 0.26×
EV/Sales 0.16×
FCF yield 57.8%
P/C 1.1×
P/E 5.2×
Div. yield —
Fwd P/E —
P/B —
PEG —

2 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Durability

How predictable is the revenue, and how much of it is already committed?

1.6
RPO / sales —
RPO growth —
Segment HHI —

3 of 7 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Resilience

Can the balance sheet absorb a bad year?

3.0
ND/EBITDA -0.34
Current ratio 0.61×
Debt payback 0.89 yr
Payout 0.0%
Cash / Debt 0.63×
F-score 5.6 pts
Quick ratio 0.61×
Cash runway —
Debt / Eq —
Equity / Assets —
Net debt / Eq —

3 of 12 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

Growth

Is the business getting bigger, and is it getting more profitable?

1.1
Sales/sh Y/Y -6.2%
EBIT CAGR -44.5%
EBIT Y/Y -78.5%
EPS Y/Y -82.8%
Sales Q/Q -9.1%
Div. growth —
EPS CAGR 4Y —
EPS next Y —
Shares change —

4 of 13 counted in the score. The rest are measures this model does not include here, or figures these filings do not carry — switch any of them on and the score changes.

A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states; the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.