Every figure this model derived for BBW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-05-02.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BBW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
16.71
current ratio
1.53
current ratio reported
1.53
deferred revenue growth
7.2
dilution pct
-3.96
ev ebit
4.84
ev owner earnings
12.72
ev sales
0.65
fcf margin
5.5
growth cv
1.27
operating margin
13.43
owner earnings margin
5.12
roic
42.1
sbc pct revenue
0.38
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BBW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 0.1% of revenue from the 71M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions