No price history is stored for AJB.L, so there is no chart to
draw. Every figure below is read from the filings and does not depend on one.
Figures as at 2025-09-30,
reported in GBP. The newest fact in the filings is dated
2025-10-01, 329 days ago.
Nothing on this page is advice.
How it scores
Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's
own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the
companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or
somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low
end is the good end.
A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's
filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is
averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states;
the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where
they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AJB.L on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
42.81
current ratio
3.65
current ratio reported
3.65
ev ebit
17.63
ev owner earnings
28.67
ev sales
7.32
fcf margin
26.82
interest cover
141.74
operating margin
41.52
owner earnings margin
25.53
revenue growth
17.97
revenue growth per share
17.97
roic
356.27
rule of 40
59.48
sbc pct revenue
1.29
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
share count is from 2025-09-30 (330 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
See it scored yourself
The dashboard puts AJB.L beside other companies and lets you
change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which
of the 61 measures are included at all.