Every figure this model derived for ABNB, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ABNB on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
33.91
current ratio
1.67
current ratio reported
1.41
deferred revenue growth
-0.91
dilution pct
-3.41
ebit cagr
12.71
ebit yoy
5.11
ev ebit
38.06
ev owner earnings
33.05
ev sales
7.92
fcf margin
36.93
growth cv
0.8
interest cover
1369.0
operating margin
20.81
owner earnings margin
23.96
revenue growth
13.64
revenue growth per share
17.65
rule of 40
34.44
sbc pct revenue
12.97
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ABNB's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
invested capital is -1,794M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`