ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) · Peers
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services against the 38 other companies here in its SEC industry, Deep Sea Foreign Transportation Of Freight. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 39, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | ZIM | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $3.52B | median $771.05M | 6 of 38 |
| P/E | 7.3× | median 13.2× | 21 of 28 |
| Forward P/E | 3.6× | median 5.8× | 26 of 27 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.6× | median 7.4× | 25 of 32 |
| P/S | 0.5× | median 2.0× | 31 of 36 |
| FCF yield | 59.2% | median 11.9% | 4 of 38 |
| Dividend yield | 14.7% | median 3.6% | 2 of 26 |
| Gross margin | 19.1% | median 62.2% | 7 of 10 |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | median 31.2% | 25 of 35 |
| Net margin | 7.0% | median 20.1% | 27 of 36 |
| ROIC | 9.2% | median 7.7% | 13 of 34 |
| ROE | 12.0% | median 8.8% | 14 of 38 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | -10.4% | median 10.9% | 29 of 32 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | -43.5% | median -9.2% | 9 of 9 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.0× | median 2.9× | 15 of 23 |
| Current ratio | 1.4× | median 2.4× | 30 of 39 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.1% | median 0.8% | 27 of 37 |
| Share count change | 0.0% | median 0.7% | 21 of 37 |
Green where ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | $3.52B | P/E 7.3× | 9.2% | 5.2 |
| FROFrontline plc | $11.69B | P/E 30.8× | 8.9% | 5.4 |
| CDLRCadeler A/S | $7.63B | P/E – | 8.2% | 5.7 |
| STNGScorpio Tankers Inc. | $4.22B | P/E 12.2× | 9.2% | 5.4 |
| TRMDTORM plc | $3.87B | P/E 13.5× | 8.8% | 5.3 |
| DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. | $3.79B | P/E 18.0× | 12.0% | 6.7 |
| ECOOkeanis Eco Tankers Corp. | $3.18B | P/E 25.9× | 12.1% | 5.8 |
| SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp. | $3.15B | P/E 37.4× | 5.3% | 5.3 |
| DACDanaos Corp | $2.89B | P/E 5.8× | 10.4% | 6.7 |
| NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P. | $2.52B | P/E 8.8× | – | 6.3 |
| LPGDorian LPG Ltd. | $2.29B | P/E 7.1× | 17.2% | 7.5 |
| SFLSFL Corp Ltd. | $1.79B | P/E – | 3.0% | 4.3 |
| CMRECostamare Inc. | $1.68B | P/E 4.6× | 10.8% | 6.1 |
| TENTsakos Energy Navigation Ltd | $1.54B | P/E 9.6× | 5.5% | 5.6 |
| GSLGlobal Ship Lease, Inc. | $1.48B | P/E 3.6× | 15.5% | 7.2 |
| NVGSNavigator Holdings Ltd. | $1.39B | P/E 13.9× | 11.6% | 6.4 |
| TKTeekay Corp Ltd | $1.21B | P/E 12.3× | 19.6% | 6.3 |
| GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Ltd | $1.07B | P/E 26.5× | 0.5% | 5.4 |
| SBSafe Bulkers Inc | $800.69M | P/E 20.8× | 4.3% | 5.6 |
| ASCArdmore Shipping Corp | $771.05M | P/E 13.2× | – | 6.0 |
| HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd. | $750.13M | P/E 25.3× | 6.5% | 5.4 |
| PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. | $498.26M | P/E 10.5× | 11.2% | 6.0 |
| ESEAEuroseas Ltd | $466.89M | P/E 3.4× | 23.4% | 7.5 |
| SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | $322.62M | P/E 15.2× | 5.7% | 4.6 |
| GASSStealthGas Inc. | $318.68M | P/E 5.3× | 7.7% | 6.7 |
| DSXDiana Shipping Inc. | $289.47M | P/E 16.2× | 2.8% | 5.1 |
| SMHISEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. | $222.76M | P/E – | 3.4% | 3.8 |
| HMRHeidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. | $94.62M | P/E – | – | 5.2 |
| TOROToro Corp. | $88.90M | P/E 15.0× | -4.8% | 2.9 |
| PXSPyxis Tankers Inc. | $78.14M | P/E 39.2× | 3.4% | 4.4 |
| GLBSGlobus Maritime Ltd | $66.91M | P/E – | 1.8% | 5.9 |
| NCTIntercont (Cayman) Ltd | $36.01M | P/E 11.6× | – | 6.7 |
| EHLDEuroholdings Ltd. | $33.24M | P/E 2.3× | 31.7% | 7.1 |
| PSHGPerformance Shipping Inc. | $19.02M | P/E – | 17.2% | 5.4 |
| CTRMCastor Maritime Inc. | $15.85M | P/E – | -3.9% | 4.7 |
| HTCOHigh-Trend International Group | $13.53M | P/E – | – | 4.5 |
| RBNERobin Energy Ltd. | $2.16M | P/E – | 2.3% | 5.0 |
| TOPSTop Ships Inc. | $2.08M | P/E – | 7.0% | 5.5 |
| CISSC3is Inc. | – | P/E – | 1.1% | 4.5 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.