Every figure this model derived for XPEV, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
3,155,865,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
20,546,905,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
63,253,827,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
58,113,349,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
30,368,590,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
379,931,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
8,258,529,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
76,719,742,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
564,327,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
XPEV on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-0.52
current ratio
1.12
current ratio reported
1.09
deferred revenue growth
14.69
dilution pct
0.67
fcf margin
6.65
interest cover
-7.29
operating margin
-3.61
owner earnings margin
5.92
revenue growth
87.73
revenue growth per share
86.49
roic
-11.5
rule of 40
84.12
sbc pct revenue
0.74
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about XPEV's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
reports in CNY while its share price is quoted in USD, and no exchange rate could be used (no rate for USD to CNY that is less than 30 days old, and this is not a refresh). Every multiple would pair one currency with another, so none of them is a ratio — set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml in CNY to score it
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left