INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) · Peers
INNOVATE against the 9 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 344x (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 10, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | VATE | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $81.85M | median $2.13B | 8 of 10 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5× | median 15.0× | 8 of 8 |
| P/S | 0.1× | median 2.0× | 10 of 10 |
| FCF yield | 171.9% | median 1.8% | 1 of 10 |
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | median 0.6% | 1 of 4 |
| Gross margin | 15.9% | median 27.0% | 9 of 9 |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | median 7.9% | 6 of 9 |
| Net margin | -1.5% | median 4.6% | 6 of 9 |
| ROIC | 17.6% | median 5.8% | 3 of 9 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 0.8% | median 4.2% | 8 of 8 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.7× | median 1.8× | 1 of 6 |
| Current ratio | 0.5× | median 3.1× | 10 of 10 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.1% | median 2.0% | 10 of 10 |
| Share count change | 23.6% | median -0.6% | 3 of 9 |
Green where INNOVATE is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VATEINNOVATE Corp. | $81.85M | P/E – | 17.6% | 5.6 |
| VMIValmont Industries Inc | $8.58B | P/E 17.3× | 19.2% | 5.4 |
| ACAArcosa, Inc. | $7.22B | P/E 14.7× | 6.4% | 5.0 |
| XEX-Energy, Inc. | $5.57B | P/E – | – | 4.5 |
| GFFGriffon Corp | $4.21B | P/E 23.5× | 28.2% | 5.9 |
| SMRNUSCALE POWER Corp | $2.13B | P/E – | -58.5% | 2.7 |
| PRLBProto Labs Inc | $2.05B | P/E 67.2× | 5.3% | 5.5 |
| JBIJanus International Group, Inc. | $570.30M | P/E 17.2× | 6.7% | 5.3 |
| TPCSTechprecision Corp | $54.84M | P/E – | -5.1% | 4.1 |
| MTENMingteng International Corp Inc. | $7.18M | P/E – | -1.6% | 4.1 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.