Trane Technologies plc (TT) · Peers
Trane Technologies against the 73 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 382x (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 74, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | TT | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $100.97B | median $752.06M | 4 of 74 |
| P/E | 34.2× | median 42.6× | 25 of 34 |
| Forward P/E | 30.0× | median 28.2× | 16 of 42 |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.9× | median 26.7× | 23 of 39 |
| P/S | 4.5× | median 3.9× | 35 of 73 |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | median 1.4% | 16 of 73 |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | median 0.5% | 5 of 22 |
| Operating margin | 17.9% | median -0.6% | 17 of 69 |
| Net margin | 13.3% | median -1.4% | 16 of 69 |
| ROIC | 25.9% | median 0.1% | 6 of 64 |
| ROE | 34.2% | median -2.0% | 4 of 70 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 10.8% | median 6.6% | 16 of 65 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 21.9% | median -2.3% | 2 of 24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.8× | median 2.1× | 24 of 28 |
| Current ratio | 1.5× | median 2.9× | 62 of 73 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.4% | median 2.6% | 68 of 71 |
| Share count change | -1.5% | median 0.8% | 57 of 71 |
Green where Trane Technologies is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTTrane Technologies plc | $100.97B | P/E 34.2× | 25.9% | 5.5 |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc | $255.13B | P/E 36.6× | 6.8% | 4.6 |
| KLACKLA Corporation | $216.55B | P/E 44.8× | 46.6% | 5.7 |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | $161.01B | P/E 40.2× | 5.3% | 5.0 |
| AMEAmetek Inc | $56.90B | P/E 36.1× | 11.5% | 5.4 |
| KEYSKeysight Technologies, Inc. | $56.60B | P/E 53.7× | 12.2% | 5.2 |
| TERTeradyne Inc | $50.81B | P/E 44.2× | 41.0% | 6.0 |
| AAgilent Technologies Inc | $48.85B | P/E 34.5× | 14.7% | 5.1 |
| ROKRockwell Automation Inc | $47.33B | P/E 39.4× | 28.8% | 5.0 |
| COHRCoherent Inc | $45.61B | P/E 56.7× | 5.5% | 4.5 |
| WATWaters Corporation | $42.93B | P/E 258.4× | – | 4.8 |
| ILMNIllumina Inc | $39.64B | P/E 48.1× | 32.1% | 4.8 |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc | $37.85B | P/E 15.1× | 6.5% | 5.6 |
| MTDMettler-Toledo International Inc | $32.51B | P/E 35.9× | – | 5.1 |
| VLTOVeralto Corp | $24.82B | P/E 25.6× | 20.7% | 5.3 |
| FTVFortive Corp | $17.62B | P/E 32.4× | 6.2% | 4.7 |
| RVTYRevvity Inc. | $17.03B | P/E 71.7× | 3.0% | 4.2 |
| MKSIMKS Instruments Inc | $14.53B | P/E 33.0× | 10.6% | 4.9 |
| TRMBTrimble Inc | $13.86B | P/E – | 8.0% | 5.3 |
| AVTRAvantor, Inc. | $11.21B | P/E – | -2.5% | 4.3 |
| ONTOOnto Innovation Inc | $10.83B | P/E 81.7× | 262.5% | 5.1 |
| NVMINova Ltd | $10.21B | P/E 39.4× | 25.6% | 5.9 |
| BIOBio-RAD Laboratories, Inc. | $9.48B | P/E 42.6× | 0.6% | 4.9 |
| CGNXCognex Corp | $9.08B | P/E 52.0× | 15.4% | 5.5 |
| TXG10x Genomics, Inc. | $8.92B | P/E – | -25.5% | 4.1 |
| BRKRBruker Corp | $8.31B | P/E – | -0.6% | 3.9 |
| RALRalliant Corp | $7.36B | P/E – | -38.2% | 4.2 |
| CAMTCamtek Ltd | $5.93B | P/E 117.0× | 11.4% | 5.2 |
| STSensata Technologies Holding plc | $5.91B | P/E 65.7× | 4.1% | 5.2 |
| VNTVontier Corp | $4.51B | P/E 13.0× | 18.1% | 5.5 |
| MIRMirion Technologies, Inc. | $3.69B | P/E 150.4× | 1.7% | 4.9 |
| BMIBadger Meter Inc | $3.67B | P/E 29.2× | 21.8% | 5.7 |
| ITRIItron, Inc. | $3.64B | P/E 13.3× | 9.7% | 5.8 |
| COHUCohu Inc | $2.41B | P/E – | -4.8% | 4.6 |
| AEHRAehr Test Systems | $1.98B | P/E – | -10.8% | 3.1 |
| ALMRAlamar Biosciences, Inc. | $1.75B | P/E – | – | 4.2 |
| ALNTAllient Inc | $1.58B | P/E 55.1× | 8.5% | 4.7 |
| TRNSTranscat Inc | $752.06M | P/E 218.2× | 2.3% | 4.3 |
| MLABMesa Laboratories Inc | $685.38M | P/E 102.1× | 7.9% | 5.6 |
| CTKBCytek Biosciences, Inc. | $682.41M | P/E – | -14.2% | 4.3 |
| FEIMFrequency Electronics Inc | $643.33M | P/E – | -4.3% | 3.3 |
And 33 smaller ones.
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.