Tandy Leather Factory Inc (TLF) · Peers
Tandy Leather Factory against the 8 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 31xx (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 9, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | TLF | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $19.58M | median $1.62B | 8 of 8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.4× | median 11.4× | 1 of 7 |
| P/S | 0.3× | median 0.7× | 7 of 8 |
| FCF yield | -11.8% | median 6.1% | 8 of 8 |
| Dividend yield | 30.9% | median 1.8% | 1 of 6 |
| Gross margin | 59.5% | median 47.5% | 3 of 9 |
| Operating margin | -0.5% | median 8.1% | 8 of 9 |
| Net margin | -1.9% | median 5.4% | 8 of 9 |
| ROIC | -0.7% | median 10.6% | 8 of 9 |
| ROE | -3.1% | median 14.5% | 8 of 9 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | -2.0% | median -1.6% | 5 of 8 |
| EPS growth (yearly) | 61.9% | median 1.7% | 1 of 6 |
| Current ratio | 4.6× | median 1.8× | 1 of 9 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 0.7% | median 0.7% | 5 of 9 |
| Share count change | -5.9% | median -0.8% | 9 of 9 |
Green where Tandy Leather Factory is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLFTandy Leather Factory Inc | $19.58M | P/E – | -0.7% | 5.0 |
| TPRTapestry Inc | $23.96B | P/E 15.7× | 78.8% | 6.4 |
| SHOOSteven Madden, Ltd. | $3.31B | P/E 23.1× | 17.1% | 6.0 |
| CPRICapri Holdings Ltd | $1.81B | P/E 11.8× | 4.8% | 4.7 |
| WWWWolverine World Wide Inc | $1.62B | P/E 15.0× | 15.0% | 5.6 |
| CALCaleres Inc | $435.99M | P/E – | 0.9% | 5.2 |
| RCKYRocky Brands Inc | $343.20M | P/E 11.9× | 9.0% | 4.8 |
| VRAVera Bradley, Inc. | $166.36M | P/E – | -11.9% | 4.7 |
| BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc | – | P/E – | 12.1% | 5.6 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.