Stock Scorer

Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) · Peers

Thryv Holdings against the 17 other companies here in its SEC industry, Services-Advertising. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 18, highest first.

Measure by measure

MeasureTHRYPeer medianRank
Market value $50.66M median $14.62M 8 of 18
EV/EBITDA 4.6× median 14.0× 5 of 5
P/S 0.1× median 0.8× 17 of 18
FCF yield 75.3% median -3.9% 1 of 18
Gross margin 66.1% median 63.2% 7 of 16
Operating margin 4.7% median -15.8% 4 of 16
Net margin -2.3% median -10.0% 6 of 17
ROIC 5.4% median -19.2% 4 of 12
ROE -7.6% median -32.3% 6 of 12
Revenue growth (4y, yearly) -8.4% median -0.7% 10 of 13
Current ratio 1.2× median 0.9× 9 of 18
Stock pay / revenue 2.7% median 2.1% 8 of 17
Share count change 19.8% median 12.1% 8 of 16

Green where Thryv Holdings is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.

The peers, largest first

CompanyMarket valueP/EROICScore
THRYThryv Holdings, Inc. $50.66M P/E – 5.4% 5.5
CCOClear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. $1.23B P/E – 16.7% 4.5
IBTAIbotta, Inc. $1.10B P/E 307.6× -10.1% 5.5
MNTNMNTN, Inc. $816.30M P/E 14.5× 36.4% 8.3
ANGIAngi Inc. $253.27M P/E – -19.2% 5.0
NCMINational CineMedia, Inc. $191.90M P/E – -4.6% 6.9
FLNTFluent, Inc. $85.66M P/E – -19.8% 4.2
TZOOTravelzoo $50.91M P/E 108.1× – 7.2
IZEAIZEA Worldwide, Inc. $40.75M P/E 962.9× -401.2% 4.4
MOBQMobiquity Technologies, Inc. $14.62M P/E – -270.3% 2.8
PSQHPSQ Holdings, Inc. $10.92M P/E – – 5.0
EDHLEverbright Digital Holding Ltd. $9.28M P/E – – 3.5
INUVInuvo, Inc. $6.92M P/E – -71.9% 4.1
ADMQADM Endeavors, Inc. $6.66M P/E 17.4× 7.6% 4.5
BLISNAPC Defense, Inc. $4.47M P/E – – 4.0
ZICXZicix Corp $2.98M P/E – – 2.8
ONAROnar Holding Corp $1.42M P/E – – 2.4
DRCTDirect Digital Holdings, Inc. $226,880 P/E – -367.6% 3.2

The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.