Figures as at the most recent filing,
reported in GEL. The newest fact in the filings is dated
2026-01-01, 237 days ago.
Nothing on this page is advice.
How it scores
Five questions, each answered by the measures under it. Every figure is the company's
own; the bar beside it is where that figure sits among the
companies read here — the top fifth, the bottom fifth, or
somewhere between. Not among all listed companies, and for a valuation multiple the low
end is the good end.
A measure absent from a block could not be computed from this company's
filings. It is left out rather than scored as though it were bad, and the dimension is
averaged over what remains. A score is measured against a fixed scale this model states;
the bar is measured against the other companies, so the two can disagree — and where
they do, that disagreement is the more interesting figure.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
reports in GEL while its share price is quoted in GBP, and no exchange rate could be used (no rate for GBP to GEL that is less than 30 days old, and this is not a refresh). Every multiple would pair one currency with another, so none of them is a ratio — set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml in GEL to score it
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
See it scored yourself
The dashboard puts TBCG.L beside other companies and lets you
change what counts: the weight of each dimension, the value that earns a ten, and which
of the 61 measures are included at all.