Every figure this model derived for SNDA, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
37,147,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
48,709,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
110,438,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
125,363,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
861,588,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
55,259,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
-15,560,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
525,973,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
7,405,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SNDA on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
5.42
current ratio
0.88
current ratio reported
0.88
deferred revenue growth
-41.61
dilution pct
28.22
fcf margin
-10.02
growth cv
7.89
interest cover
-1.29
net debt ebitda
73.01
operating margin
-13.59
owner earnings margin
-11.43
revenue growth
49.37
revenue growth per share
16.5
roic
-2.35
rule of 40
35.78
sbc pct revenue
1.41
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SNDA's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2024-12-31, 546 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left