Sentient Brands Holdings Inc. (SNBH) · Peers
Sentient Brands Holdings against the 12 other companies here in its SEC industry, SIC 57xx (the wider group: its own four-digit code has fewer than five). Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 13, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | SNBH | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $1.54M | median $1.02B | 13 of 13 |
| P/S | 1.2× | median 0.9× | 6 of 13 |
| FCF yield | -11.8% | median 4.9% | 12 of 13 |
| Gross margin | 15.0% | median 46.1% | 12 of 12 |
| Operating margin | -14.0% | median 6.6% | 12 of 12 |
| Net margin | -35.3% | median 3.0% | 11 of 12 |
| Revenue growth (4y, yearly) | 151.2% | median -2.4% | 1 of 10 |
| Current ratio | 0.2× | median 1.8× | 12 of 12 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 53.1% | median 0.6% | 1 of 13 |
| Share count change | 57.1% | median -0.4% | 1 of 10 |
Green where Sentient Brands Holdings is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNBHSentient Brands Holdings Inc. | $1.54M | P/E – | – | 4.5 |
| WSMWilliams-Sonoma Inc | $29.46B | P/E 27.1× | 91.9% | 6.5 |
| BBYBest Buy Co. Inc | $19.52B | P/E 17.1× | 49.0% | 6.9 |
| GMEGameStop Corp. | $12.03B | P/E 15.8× | 18.6% | 7.5 |
| RHRH | $2.14B | P/E 20.7× | 9.6% | 5.5 |
| BOBSBob's Discount Furniture, Inc. | $1.94B | P/E 32.2× | – | 4.8 |
| ARHSArhaus, Inc. | $1.41B | P/E 20.4× | 30.5% | 6.3 |
| HVTHaverty Furniture Companies Inc | $625.84M | P/E 27.4× | 138.0% | 7.4 |
| LOVELovesac Co | $213.50M | P/E 56.0× | 1.6% | 6.5 |
| HTLMHomesToLife Ltd | $147.98M | P/E 8.9× | 2707.5% | 8.1 |
| TTSHTile Shop Holdings, Inc. | $83.23M | P/E – | -4.5% | 4.3 |
| AMCIAMC Robotics Corp | $55.82M | P/E – | -6.9% | 4.7 |
| CRWECrown Equity Holdings, Inc. | $10.10M | P/E – | – | 5.1 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.