Every figure this model derived for SN.L, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
557,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalents
2026-01-01
current assets
4,103,000,000
CurrentAssets
2026-01-01
current liabilities
1,595,000,000
CurrentLiabilities
2026-01-01
equity
5,289,000,000
EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent
2026-01-01
interest expense
140,000,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
1,285,000,000
CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
6,164,000,000
RevenueFromContractsWithCustomers
2025-12-31
sbc
43,000,000
AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SN.L on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
13.58
current ratio
2.57
current ratio reported
2.57
ebit cagr
7.57
ebit yoy
20.85
ev ebit
15.17
ev owner earnings
9.7
ev sales
1.95
fcf margin
20.85
growth cv
0.73
interest cover
5.67
operating margin
12.88
owner earnings margin
20.15
revenue growth
6.09
revenue growth per share
6.09
roic
13.26
rule of 40
18.97
sbc pct revenue
0.7
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SN.L's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
reports in USD and quotes in GBP, so the share price is converted at 1 GBP = 1.3590 USD as at 2026-08-28. Only the price is converted: every figure from the filing is as reported, and only the multiples built on market capitalisation carry the rate
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage