Every figure this model derived for SMTK, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
123,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
3,689,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
10,356,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
675,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
9,681,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-5,008,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
662,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
997,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
SMTK on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-1229.0
current ratio
18.2
current ratio reported
15.34
dilution pct
150.35
fcf margin
-775.08
growth cv
1.54
operating margin
-1404.38
owner earnings margin
-925.68
revenue growth
582.47
revenue growth per share
172.61
roic
-120.54
rule of 40
-821.91
sbc pct revenue
150.6
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about SMTK's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: net margin -- net margin came out at -4,320% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 662,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 4M of net cash against a 5M annual burn is 0.7 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
no interest expense tagged while 0M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect