Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) · Peers
Serve Robotics against the 13 other companies here in its SEC industry, General Industrial Machinery & Equipment, Nec. Each figure is the one on the company's own page; the median is the peers', and the rank is among all 14, highest first.
Measure by measure
| Measure | SERV | Peer median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market value | $280.07M | median $1.94B | 9 of 14 |
| P/S | 35.9× | median 6.0× | 2 of 14 |
| FCF yield | -60.6% | median 0.3% | 12 of 14 |
| Gross margin | -370.1% | median 32.5% | 14 of 14 |
| Operating margin | -2476.8% | median -0.0% | 14 of 14 |
| ROIC | -131.0% | median -4.9% | 13 of 13 |
| ROE | -51.3% | median 1.2% | 13 of 14 |
| Current ratio | 14.3× | median 2.3× | 2 of 14 |
| Stock pay / revenue | 449.4% | median 8.9% | 1 of 14 |
| Share count change | 70.0% | median 17.3% | 5 of 13 |
Green where Serve Robotics is on the better side of the median, red where on the worse; no colour where higher is neither, like size or dividend yield.
The peers, largest first
| Company | Market value | P/E | ROIC | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERVServe Robotics Inc. | $280.07M | P/E – | -131.0% | 4.9 |
| SYMSymbotic Inc. | $23.41B | P/E 2852.0× | – | 5.5 |
| NDSNNordson Corporation | $17.95B | P/E 32.3× | 12.9% | 5.6 |
| RRXRegal Beloit Corporation | $10.26B | P/E 31.6× | 4.9% | 4.6 |
| ESABESAB Corp | $4.06B | P/E 23.5× | 6.1% | 4.7 |
| CHRNChronoScale Holdings Corp | $2.20B | P/E – | -12.7% | 3.3 |
| OUSTOuster, Inc. | $2.05B | P/E – | -44.9% | 4.8 |
| HSAIHesai Group | $1.94B | P/E 31.1× | 3.0% | 5.4 |
| RRRichtech Robotics Inc. | $289.37M | P/E – | -99.1% | 3.4 |
| AZA2Z CUST2MATE Solutions Corp. | $250.16M | P/E – | -44.1% | 2.9 |
| HLPHongli Group Inc. | $220.32M | P/E 113.4× | 3.0% | 3.1 |
| TAYDTaylor Devices, Inc. | $174.38M | P/E 20.4× | 18.5% | 5.8 |
| KITTNauticus Robotics, Inc. | $9.34M | P/E – | -72.1% | 2.4 |
| INLFINLIF Ltd | $2.67M | P/E – | -48.4% | 3.6 |
The industry is the Standard Industrial Classification code the company registered with the SEC. It is a broad label: a peer group is a starting point for comparing, not proof that two businesses are alike. None of this is advice.